Torque and fuel through umbilical make the impossible real, safe, and inexpensive!
WOLASC (WOodward-LAzar Space Craft)
Named for Dr. James Woodward (and myself, James Dante Wood), the re-definer of the Mach Force, now called the Woodward Force, and Bob Lazar, who recently received backup confirmation of his experience in a manmade flying saucer at S-4/Area 51 in Nevada in 1989. The ship used high density Moscovium (Mc-115) at the center, causing gravity waves to force the craft to spin enough to achieve 30 feet of lift for about 5 minutes before the Mc-115 disintegrated. The is typical of all manmade elements heavier than U-92 (Uranium). High density at the center of a saucer is the opposite of pulling a plug at the bottom of a sink, creating a vacuum, but has the same effect in causing rotation. The water molecules cannot all enter the drain at the same time, so the path of least resistance is a vortex, counter-clockwise north of the equator because of the Coriolis Force. High oscillation rates, rotational or linear, near large objects or dense mass and high gravity with enough bend in space-time according General Relativity Effects cause the object to move in the perpendicular direction. This is an explanation for the existence of inertia, or resistance to acceleration, first theorized by Ernst Mach. Woodward produced evidence of this at Cal State Fullerton in 2012 with capacitors oscillating back and forth in a line, so the error is less because of torque from rotational movement, two benefits for a future manmade flying saucer. If you increase your spin rate fast enough, and near something with a much more intense gravitational field like the Sun, it could lead to the Stargate Effect, a quick launch to distant stars. Enough revolutions near and around the Sun (eg. “The Voyage Home”, Star Trek, 1985) to quickly achieve speeds near the speed of light (c) are possible. The “Mach Forces” on the body, which increase but in smaller increments of time become much smaller right before true near-c speeds, and are not lethal with testing on inertia-sensing robots first. The fatal crushing of the body does not happen if time intervals for each new speed shrink exponentially for the higher speeds, as acceleration rate and calibrated new time intervals are controlled with a computer. The Woodward Force could very well be the counterpart to the common gravitational force, the same way electric and magnetic fields or forces, called one force or the electro-magnetic force, are perpendicular to each other. According to my theory designed to explained the Unified Field Theory Effect, the forces are asymmetric in strength. The weaker the force, the more asymmetric the counterpart force, and the more asymmetric the attractive versus repulsive magnitudes of the force. Gravity is highly repulsive only when two very dense black holes are near one another, and the attractive nature of gravity with less dense objects like Earth and Sun, an equivalent strong force even if 90 millions miles apart.
Because of scaling, where a space/air craft with fixed shape and constant density, has the mass proportional to volume go up by the cube, but the surface area of the wing, needed to be large for more lift, only goes up by the square, what is called “scaling” limits the size of your air craft in the atmosphere for benefiting from Bernoulli lift. That is why you can not fly with a turbo prop anything bigger than the Spruce Goose, unless you replace streel and aluminum with ceramic composites consisting of carbon (graphene, CNT’s) matrices, for something much stiffer to withstand air forces and rough landings but much less dense. It is like dividing 2^3/2^2 = 2, 3^3/3^2 = 3, 4^3/4^2 = 4, and so on. Relative viscosity is also higher for the smaller objects, which is why the bumble bee is perfectly aerodynamically stable, not just because of the benefit of scaling for smaller objects. That is why a human cannot fly by flapping his or her arms, but can swim with the same movements because of water molecule density and the proximity of molecules. When it comes to rotational air/space craft, bigger is better. Even higher density is better. The bigger radius, bigger moment of inertia, not just from higher radius but higher mass from filled and higher density objects, means more torque to offset gravity and Bernoulli restrictions when in the atmosphere, but higher speeds when not inhibited by air resistance or gravity in outer space. Filled shells versus concentric shells have higher moments of inertia independent of mass, and although air/space craft must have air-filled chambers for people and cargo, more mass shifted outward toward the rim from water or U-92 byproducts means even higher moments of inertia for quasi-torus effect. A filled torus has the highest moment of inertia of any round object, Mass x Radius^2, as all other round objects (spheres, cylinders, etc.) have a coefficient in front of Mass x Radius^2 less than 1.
See frisbees explained for an example of how a toy prototype influences flying saucer concepts. This was largely the result of the work of Enrico Fermi and Richard Feynman for explanations on gyroscopes, gyroscopic inertia, and rotational aerodynamics.